<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">postsoviet</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Проблемы постсоветского пространства</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Post-Soviet Issues</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2313-8920</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-8174</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Centre of Regional Research</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24975/2313-8920-2017-4-2-148-158</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">postsoviet-118</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ.</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS.</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Эволюция турецко-грузинских отношений: новые тенденции (экономический и военно-политический аспекты)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The evolution of Turkish-Georgian relations: new trends (economic and military-political aspects)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алексанян</surname><given-names>Лариса М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Aleksanyan</surname><given-names>Larisa M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>119992, Россия, Москва, ул. Остоженка, 53/2;</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>bld. 53/2, Ostozhenka Street, Moscow, Russia, 119992</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">larisa.aleksanyan@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Дипломатическая академия МИД РФ</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>148</fpage><lpage>158</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Алексанян Л.М., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Алексанян Л.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Aleksanyan L.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.postsovietarea.com/jour/article/view/118">https://www.postsovietarea.com/jour/article/view/118</self-uri><abstract><p>Южный Кавказ представляет собой специфический регион во всей политической истории человечества. Этот регион на протяжении столетий, представлявший собой связующее звено между странами Востока и Запада, находился в эпицентре столкновения разных религий, цивилизаций, наций и государств.На современном этапе интересы глобальных и региональных акторов международных отношений стали выражаться в распространении собственного влияния на данный регион. В эту большую игру также включилась Турция, основная цель которой — превращение в регионального лидера. В плане реализации этой политики Турция высоко оценила географическое расположение Грузии в качестве моста между собой и тюрко-язычным миром. С середины 1990-х годов Турция активными темпами внедрилась в эту страну, распространяя свое влияние почти во всех сферах и обеспечивая надежный коридор для проникновения в турко-язычные государства в плане реализации своей внешней политики. Грузия, в свою очередь, стала рассматривать Турцию как надежного политического и экономического партнера как в двусторонних отношениях, так и в региональном измерении. Главной мотивацией для Грузии стала интеграция в евроатлантический альянс с помощью Турции.Таким образом, двусторонняя заинтересованность привела к сотрудничеству двух стран почти во всех сферах, одновременно отталкивая во второй план некоторые проблемы и противоречия.В данной статье рассмотрены роль и место Грузии во внешней политике Турции в региональном контексте. Исследована эволюция турецко-грузинских отношений, рассмотрены новые тенденции в двусторонних отношениях на современном этапе. Проведен анализ турецко-грузинского экономического и военно-политического сотрудничества. Сделаны обобщающие выводы касательно новых тенденций в турецко-грузинских взаимоотношениях в 21 веке.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The South Caucasus is a specific region in the whole political history of mankind. For centuries this region, acting as a bridge between the countries of the East and West, has been in a clash centre of religions, civilizations, nations and states.At the present stage, global and regional actors of international relations began to express their interests in the spread of their own influence over the region. Turkey, the main goal of which is to become a regional leader, has also joined this great game. In terms of implementing this policy Turkey highly appreciated the geographic location of Georgia, fulfilling the role of a bridge between Turkey and the Turkic-speaking world. Since the mid-1990s Turkey has actively penetrated to this country, spreading its influence in almost all spheres and providing a reliable corridor for penetration into the Turkic-speaking states.Georgia, in its turn, began to view Turkey as a reliable political and economic partner both in bilateral relations and in the regional dimension. The main motivation for Georgia is its integration into the Euro-Atlantic alliance with the help of Turkey.Thus, the interest of the two countries led them to bilateral corporation in almost all spheres, at the same time leaving some problems and contradictions in the second plan.In the article has been reviewed the role and the place of Georgia in Turkey’s foreign policy in the regional context. This article explores the evolution of Turkish-Georgian relations, considers new trends in bilateral relations at the present stage. In the article has been analyzed Turkish-Georgian economic and military-political relations. General conclusions were made in regard to new trends in Turkish-Georgian relations in the 21st century.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Турция</kwd><kwd>Грузия</kwd><kwd>внешняя политика</kwd><kwd>Южный Кавказ</kwd><kwd>экономическое сотрудничество</kwd><kwd>военно-политические отношения</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Turkey</kwd><kwd>Georgia</kwd><kwd>foreign policy</kwd><kwd>South Caucasus</kwd><kwd>economic corporation</kwd><kwd>military-political relations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аватков В.А. Неоосманизм. Базовая идеологема и геостратегия Турции. Свободная Мысль. 2014; 3; 71–78.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avatkov V.A. Neo-ottomanism. Basic ideology and geostrategy of Turkey. Free thought. 2014; 3; 71–78 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аватков В.А. Внешнеполитический дискурс ведущих субъектов турецкой политики (2010 – лето 2015). Москва: Паблис; 2015. 88 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avatkov V.A. Foreign policy discourse of leading actors of Turkish policy (2010 – summer 2015). Мoscow: Pablis; 2015. 88 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаджиев К. Геополитика Кавказа. Москва: Международные отношения; 2001. 463 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gadjiev K. Geopolitics of the Caucasus. Moscow: International relations; 2001. 463 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гриневецкий С.Р., Жильцов С.С., Зонн И.С. Геополитическое казино Причерноморья. Москва: Восток-Запад; 2009. 351 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grinevetskiy S.R., Zhiltsov S.S., Zonn I.S. Geopolitical casino of the Black Sea region. Moscow: East-West; 2009. 351 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жильцов С. Трубопроводная архитектура в каспийском регионе: итоги и перспективы. Politbook. 2015; 2: 114-132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhiltsov S.S. Pipeline architecture in the Caspian region: results and prospects. Politbook. 2015; 2: 114-132. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кенгерли З. Геостратегические интересы Турции на Кавказе. Центральная Азия и Кавказ. 2004; 6: 119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kengerli Z. Geostrategic interests of Turkey in the Caucasus. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2004; 6: 119 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сафонкина Е. А. Турция как новый актор политики мягкой силы. Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2014; 9(2): 148.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Safonkina E.A. Turkey as a new actor of soft power policy. Bulletin of International Organizations: Education, Science, New Economy. 2014; 9(2): 148 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aras B. Akpınar P. The relations between Turkey and Caucasus. Perceptions. 2011; 16(3): Pp. 53-68.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aras B. Akpınar P. The relations between Turkey and Caucasus. Perceptions. 2011; 16(3): Pp. 53-68.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chkhikvadze I. Zero Problems with Neighbors: The Case of Georgia. Turkish Policy Quarterly. 2011; 10(2): pp. 1-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chkhikvadze I. Zero Problems with Neighbors: The Case of Georgia. Turkish Policy Quarterly. 2011; 10(2): pp. 1-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Erşen E. The Evolution of “Eurasia” as a Geopolitical Concept in Post-Cold War Turkey. Geopolitics. 2013; 1: 24-44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Erşen E. The Evolution of “Eurasia” as a Geopolitical Concept in Post-Cold War Turkey. Geopolitics. 2013; 1: 24-44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ekinci D. Partnership in the marketing since 1991: Black Sea and Caspian Concerns of Turkey and Georgia. Globalization and Security in Black and Caspian Seas regions. 2011; 1: pp. 43-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ekinci D. Partnership in the marketing since 1991: Black Sea and Caspian Concerns of Turkey and Georgia. Globalization and Security in Black and Caspian Seas regions. 2011; 1: pp. 43-56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Emel Parlar Dal Assessing Turkey’s «normative» Power in the Middle East and North Africa Region: New Dynamics and their imitations. Turkish studies. 2013; 14(4): 709-734.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Emel Parlar Dal Assessing Turkey’s «normative» Power in the Middle East and North Africa Region: New Dynamics and their imitations. Turkish studies. 2013; 14(4): 709-734.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kirişci K. Moffat A. Turkey ant the South Caucasus: An Opportunity for Soft Regionalizm. Regional issues. 2015; 67-88.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirişci K. Moffat A. Turkey ant the South Caucasus: An Opportunity for Soft Regionalizm. Regional issues. 2015; 67-88.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Statistical Yearbook of Georgia. Tbilisi: Ministry of Economic Development of Georgia; 2009. 322 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Statistical Yearbook of Georgia. Tbilisi: Ministry of Economic Development of Georgia; 2009. 322 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Turkish Business in the BSEC region. Direct investments Contracting Serviced Prospects for Cooperations. Istanbul: Foreign Economic Relations Board of Turkey; 2005. 22 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turkish Business in the BSEC region. Direct investments Contracting Serviced Prospects for Cooperations. Istanbul: Foreign Economic Relations Board of Turkey; 2005. 22 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uslu N. The Russian, Caucasian and Central Asian Aspects of Turkish Foreign Policy of the Post Cold War Period. Turkish Journal of international relations. 2003; 2(3-4): 164-187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uslu N. The Russian, Caucasian and Central Asian Aspects of Turkish Foreign Policy of the Post Cold War Period. Turkish Journal of international relations. 2003; 2(3-4): 164-187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yeşiltaş M. The transformation of the geopolitical vision in Turkish foreign policy. Turkish Studies. 2013; 14(4): 661-687.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yeşiltaş M. The transformation of the geopolitical vision in Turkish foreign policy. Turkish Studies. 2013; 14(4): 661-687.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Çelikpala M. Veliyev C. Azerbaijan-GürcistanTürkiya işbirliğinin başarı örneği. Policy Brief. CIES. 2015; 3: 2-18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chelikpala M. Veliyev C. Success of Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey cooperation. Policy Brief. CIES. 2015; 3: 2-18 (in Turkish)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Çolakoğlu S. Türkiye-Gürcistan ilişkileri. TASAM. Stratejik öngörü dergisi. 2005; 6: 29-39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cholakoglu S. Turkish-Georgian realtions. TASAM. Strategic forecasting magazine. 2005; 6: 29-39 ( in Turkish)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Görgülü A., Krıkorıan O. Türkiye’nin Güney Kafkasya Plitikası: Devlet ve Sivil Toplum Aktörlerinin Rolü. TESEV Dış politika programı. 2012; 1: 1-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Görgülü A., Krikorian O. The South Caucasus policy of Turkey: Role of State and Civil Society Actors. TESEV Dış politika programı. 2012; 1: 1-8 (in Turkish)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
