The infrastructure projects in the Caspian Region
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2019-6-4-324-335
Abstract
In recent years, the countries of the Caspian region have sought to expand regional cooperation in energy and transport spheres. For a long time, these areas of cooperation were not being developed, which negatively affected the regional economy. The revision of the existing approaches of regional countries to cooperation is dictated by the growth of problems of economic development of each country. Non-regional states have a continuing interest in the Caspian region. First of all, they are interested in projects aimed at diversifying the supply of hydrocarbon resources from the region to foreign markets. In turn, the construction of new export pipelines is considered by the countries of the Caspian region as a way of strengthening their geopolitical positions and realising socio-economic projects. New pipelines not only can create additional opportunities for the delivery of oil and gas from the region to foreign markets, but also can radically change the balance of power. This explains the increased attention to the issues of production and export of hydrocarbon resources.
At the same time, the revision of the energy policy of the regional countries, which began in the 1990s, did not reduce their dependence on non-regional states that act as final consumers or transit countries for oil and gas. The construction of new pipelines broke Russia’s monopoly over the export of hydrocarbon resources from the regional countries to foreign markets. However, the decline of Russian influence was compensated by Iran and China, which got the opportunity to influence the regional countries through pricing mechanisms and volumes of purchased hydrocarbon raw materials. For this reason, the regional countries are in favor of a further increase in the number of new pipelines, believing that their construction will expand opportunities for oil and gas exports and will reduce dependence on neighboring states.
About the Author
S. S. ZhiltsovRussian Federation
Sergey S. Zhiltsov, Doctor of Political Sciences
bld. 53/2, b. 1, Ostozhenka str. Moscow, 119021, Russia
References
1. Starchenkov G.I. Caspian oil and its transportation / Muslim countries near the borders of the CIS. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies RAS. Moscow: Kraft+; 2001. p. 298. (in Russ.)
2. Schreiner B. Doc. 9635 Europe and the Development of Energy Resources in the Caspian Sea Region. 2003 Ordinary Session (first Part), Documents 9519, 9568 and 9576-9639. Council of Europe: Parliamentary Assembly. Working Papers. 2003;1:303-315.
3. Kalyuzhny V.I. “Exhibiting the oil and gas Caspian and Black seas at the conference”, Istanbul. 27 On May. 2003. Caspian Bulletin. 2003;3:7-12 (in Russ.)
4. Rozhkov I.S. In the Face of the Strategic Choice: New Imperatives of World Policy. Post-Soviet Issues. 2017;4(3):210-220. (In Russ.)
5. Pop I. China’s Energy Strategy in Central Asia: Interaction with Russia, India and Japan. UNISCI Discussion Papers. 2010;24:200-205.
6. Peyrouse S. Turkmenistan: Strategies of Power, Dilemmas of Development: Strategies of Power, Dilemmas of Development. Routledge; 2015. 264 p.
7. Dadabaeva Z. A., Kuzmina E. M. regionalization Processes in Central Asia: problems and contradictions. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS; 2014. P. 33. (in Russ.)
8. Zonn I. S. the Caspian: illusion and reality. Moscow: Korkis; 1999. 467 p. (in Russ.)
9. Amineh M.P. Impact of the Caspian Energy Supply on the Global Market. AtlantishPerspectiev. 2003;27(7-8):27-33.
10. Dadabaev T. «Silk Road» as foreign policy discourse: the construction of Chinese, Japanese and Korean engagement strategies in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018;1:30-41.
11. Griffith B. Back Yard Politics: Russia’s Foreign Policy Toward the Caspian Basin. The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. 1998;6:426-441.
12. Sokolsky R., Charlick-Paley T. Caspian Oil and Energy Security. In NATO and Caspian Security: A Mission Too Far? RAND Corporation; 1999. p.69-80.
13. Manning R. The Myth of the Caspian Great Game and the «New Persian Gulf». The Brown Journal of World Affairs. 2000;8:15-33.
14. Umbach F., Raszewsk S. Strategic Perspectives for Bilateral Energy Cooperation between the EU and Kazakhstan Geo-Economic and Geopolitical Dimensions in Competition with Russia and Сhina’sСentral Аsia Policies. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; 2016. 70 p.
Review
For citations:
Zhiltsov S.S. The infrastructure projects in the Caspian Region. Post-Soviet Issues. 2019;6(4):324-335. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2019-6-4-324-335