Uncertainty in World Politics: New “Normality” or New “Abnormality”
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-304-314
Abstract
In the conditions of turbulent transformations of the world order, life itself, with its contradictions, difficulties and surprises, extremely actualizes the problems associated with unforeseen risks and challenges to world development. The coronavirus pandemic has created a new “normality” or, more precisely, a new “abnormality” in which countries find themselves regardless of their geopolitical status and place in the international hierarchy. The global coronavirus crisis has exacerbated the already growing uncertainty in global political processes. Uncertainty and the associated strategic instability is a breeding ground for preserving acutely problematic nodes of global politics and delaying the search for constructive solutions that bring them closer to a mutually acceptable model of the coming world order. The phenomenon of apolarity is becoming more and more complicated and has been linked in recent years with the growing weight and influence of new geopolitical players and centers of power — China, India, Latin America states. The international positions of Russia have significantly strengthened, which has acquired a full-fledged role in global politics. In the context of the current geopolitical confrontations and competitive rivalry, the experience of understanding uncertainty in the scientific and expert communities of Russia acquires special practical and political significance.
About the Author
M. A. NeimarkRussian Federation
Mark A. Neimark, Doctor of Science (History)
bld. 53/2, Ostozhenka str. Moscow, 119021
References
1. Lavrov S. V. The World in an Era of Changes: the Priorities of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. Diplomatic Yearbook 2012. Moskva: Весь мир; 2013. 13-24 P. (In Russ.)
2. Diligenskiy G. G. Does Russia Want to be Friends with the West? World Economy and International Relations. 2002;4:29-39. (In Russ.)
3. Gadziev K. Reflections on a Great Transformation Amid Turbulence. World Economy and International Relations. 2020;64(11):74-83. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-74-83. (In Russ.)
4. Taleb N. Black Swan: Under the Sign of Uncertainty. Moskva: Kolibri; 2009. 528 P. (In Russ.)
5. Mikhnevich S. V. The Factor of “Smart Power” in the Processes of Institutionalization of International Relations. International Organisations Research Journal. 2015;10(4):93-114. (In Russ.)
6. Kortunov A. Politics: the Art of Uncertainty. January 23, 2014. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Politika-iskusstvo-neopredelennosti-16326 [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
7. Karaganov S. A. How Self-deception Replaced Serious Analysis. May 15, 2019. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/predskazuemoe-budushhee/ [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
8. Zinovieva E. S., Kazantsev A. A. The Complexity of World Politics: Towards a New Analysis Methodology. World Economy and International Relations. 2015;59(4):58-67. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2015-4-58-67. (In Russ.)
9. Axelrod R. M. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1997. 248 P.
10. Boniface P. Géopolitique du Covid-19. Ce que nous révèle la crise du coronavirus. Préface de Reselyne Bachelot. Paris: Éditions Eurolles; 2020. 190 P.
11. Lapkin V. V., Pantin V.I. Global Political and Institutional Dynamics in the Context of Destabilization of the World Order (on the Example of the EU Countries and Russia). Polis. Political Studies. 2020;4:55-77. (In Russ.)
12. Dynkin A., Telegina E. Pandemic and the Postcrisis World. World Economy and International Relations. 2020;64(8):5-16. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-5-16. (In Russ.)
13. Neimark M. A. Trumpism: Crisis or Dawn of the US “Soft Power”? June 9, 2020. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/26617 [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
14. How the World Will Look After the Coronavirus Pandemic. Foreign Policy. March 20, 2020. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/20/world-order-after-coroanvirus-pandemic/ [Accessed: 28.04.2021]
15. Editorial. Grand froid entre les Etats-Unis et l’Europe. Le Monde. 20 Juin, 2020. URL: https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2020/06/20/grand-froid-entre-les-etats-unis-et-l-europe_6043560_3232.html [Accessed: 28.04.2021]
16. Yakovenko A. V. “Soft Power” and Coronavirus: Who Are Winners and Who Are Losers. April 10, 2020. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/25962 [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
17. Biden’s Administration: Risks and Opportunities for Russian Diplomacy. January 22, 2021. URL: http://www.dipacademy.ru/documents/2186/ДОКЛАД_22.01.2021_РУС.pdf [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
18. Reinkhart K., Reinkhart V. The Global Economy Will Never Be the Same. January 11, 2021. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/pandemicheskaya-depressiya/ [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
19. Remtchukov K. The Doctrine of Geopolitically Limited Sovereignty and the Rejection of the Foundations of Globalization. May 31, 2020. URL: https://www.ng.ru/ideas/2020-05-31/1_7874_doctrine.html [Accessed: 28.04.2021] (In Russ.)
20. The Economist Intelligence Unit. 12.05.2020. URL: https://www.eiu.com/n/ [Accessed: 28.04.2021]
Review
For citations:
Neimark M.A. Uncertainty in World Politics: New “Normality” or New “Abnormality”. Post-Soviet Issues. 2021;8(3):304-314. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-304-314