Preview

Post-Soviet Issues

Advanced search

Regional Security in the South Caucasus: The Energy Factor

https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-331-340

Abstract

A key factor that influenced regional security in the South Caucasus was the hostilities between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the fall of 2020. Those events have changed the balance of power in the region. The efforts of Azerbaijan, which relied on political and military support from Turkey, led to Baku’s control over part of the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. The hostilities of the fall of 2020 aggravated the internal political situation in Armenia. Turkey strengthened its position in the region. In addition to solving geopolitical problems and promoting its economic interests in the countries of the South Caucasus, Ankara’s policy was aimed at expanding its presence in the energy sector, including through increased influence on Azerbaijan. The implementation of the “Southern Gas Corridor” project has made Turkey a key “player” in the South Caucasus in the energy sphere. Ankara has gained an opportunity to influence gas supplies to Europe. It also has access to Azerbaijan’s gas streams. In the long run, Turkey hopes to reach hydrocarbon resources on the eastern coast of the Caspian Sea, particularly Turkmen gas. With information and political support from the United States, Turkey has promoted the idea of the Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline. Thus, Turkey’s policy promoted the development of the East-West Energy Corridor. The Turkish-Azerbaijani-Georgian trilateral format contributed to this. It allowed Ankara to greatly expand its presence in the South Caucasus and to impact the political and economic development of Azerbaijan and Georgia. Overall, however, Ankara’s policy has had a negative impact on regional security and has intensified the competition for influence in the South Caucasus among extra-regional actors.

About the Authors

S. S. Zhiltsov
Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry; People’s Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Sergey S. Zhiltsov, Doctor of Political Sciences

53/2, b. 1 Ostozhenka st., Moscow, 119021
bld. 6, Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198



E. M. Savicheva
People’s Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Elena M. Savicheva, Ph.D. (History)

bld. 6, Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198



References

1. Prokofiev I. V. Fuel and energy complex / Georgia: problems and development prospects: in 2 volumes. Vol. 1 / Ed. EAT. Kozhokin. Moscow: Russian Institute for Strategic Studies; 2001. P. 38–39. (In Russ.).

2. Kurtov A. A. Caspian dispute: relations between Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan / Independent Azerbaijan: new guidelines: in 2 volumes. Vol. 2 / Ed. EAT. Kozhokin. Moscow: Russian Institute for Strategic Studies; 2001. P. 76–77. (In Russ.).

3. Zhiltsov S. S, Slisovskiy D. E., Shulenina N. V., Bazhanov E. P. Azerbaijan’s energy policy: results, problems, prospects. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2017:18(1):20–24

4. Chizhevsky A. Oil transportation through the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline in January-July 2020 decreased by 11%. 2020.17 August. URL: https://neftegaz.ru/news/transport-and-storage/626270-transportirovka-nefti-po-mnp-baku-tbilisi-dzheykhan-v-yanvare-iyule-2020-g-sokratilas-na-11/ [Accessed: 06.07.2021] (In Russ.).

5. Shevchenko A. Azerbaijan reduced oil production by 7.9 % in 2020, while gas production increased by 4.3%. 2021.19 January. URL: https://neftegaz.ru/news/dobycha/659735-azerbaydzhan-snizil-dobychu-nefti-na-7-9-v-2020ga-dobychu-gaza-narastil-na-4-3/ [Accessed: 17.07.2021] (In Russ.).

6. Palaria A. Recklessness any game of cards. Especially in geographic. 1995. August 29. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/11429 [Accessed: 13.05.2021] (In Russ.)

7. Zhiltsov S. S., Zonn I. S., Ushkov A. M. Geopolitics of the Caspian region. Moscow: International relations; 2003. 196 p. (In Russ)

8. Balci B., Liles T. Turkey’s Comeback to Central Asia. Insight Turkey. 2018;1:11-26

9. Kasenov. O. Transcaucasia and Central Asia: Oil, Pipelines and Geopolitics. In: Central Asia. Conflict, Resolution an Change. Ed. By Roald Z. Sagdeev and Susan Eosenhower. Marylend: CPSS Press. Chavy Chase; 1995. P. 67–79.

10. Polievktov M. A. Exit to the sea // Caspian transit. T II. Compiled by and preparation by A.I. Kurkchi. Moscow: Publishing house DI-DIK Tanais; 1996. 616 p. (In Russ)

11. Kaymarazova M. A. Caspian territories of Russia and neighboring states in new geopolitical conditions // Collection of reports of the international scientific conference “Russian Neighborhood Policy”. Moscow, October 12-13, 2007. Moscow: 2008; 456 p. (In Russ)

12. Central Asia. Geopolitics and economy of the region. Institute of Strategic Assessments and Analysis (under the general editorship of V. A. Guseinov). Moscow: Red Star; 2010. 290 p. (In Russ)

13. Kim Y., Blank S. The new great game of Caspian energy in 2013–14: «Turk Stream», Russia and Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 2015;18(1):37–55.

14. Panfilova V. The way to Europe is being pushed for Turkmen gas. 2021.13 May. URL: https://www.ng.ru/cis/2021-05-13/5_8147_friendship.html [Accessed: 06.07.2021] (In Russ.)

15. Savosin D. Turkey is ready to help Turkmenistan in the supply of natural gas to Europe. 2021. 24 February. URL: https://neftegaz.ru/news/transport-and-storage/667129-turtsiya-gotova-pomoch-turkmenistanu-v-postavkakh-prirodnogo-gaza-v-evropu/ [Accessed: 24.04.2021] (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Zhiltsov S.S., Savicheva E.M. Regional Security in the South Caucasus: The Energy Factor. Post-Soviet Issues. 2021;8(3):331-340. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-331-340

Views: 2075


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-8920 (Print)
ISSN 2587-8174 (Online)