Preview

Post-Soviet Issues

Advanced search

Features of Political Processes in Central Asian Countries: at the present Stage

https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2024-11-4-312-324

Abstract

In the context of the crisis of the liberal democratic model, authoritarian tendencies strengthen in all Central Asian countries, including Kyrgyzstan. This country demonstrated success in the process of democratic transit for a long time. The purpose of the article is to analyze the content and nature of political processes in Central Asian countries at the present stage. Based on the method of comparative analysis common and distinctive features in the political regimes of the countries of the region are highlighted. The Central Asian countries are grouped according to the principle of recurring trends in domestic political processes. In Central Asian countries, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are the most vulnerable to «color revolutions». The likelihood of such a scenario, fraught with political instability, encourages some political leaders of the countries of the region (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan) to carry out reforms and design a political regime that more or less proportionally reflects economic reality and social needs, while others (Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan) resort to methods of «tightening the screws», clearing the space from political opposition. In both cases, this leads to the strengthening of the regime of personal power of the heads of state of the Central Asian countries, and, consequently, the president will continue to remain at the top of the power hierarchy. However, the results of the recent presidential elections in Uzbekistan and the presidential and parliamentary elections in Kazakhstan show that there is a demand for a strong government capable of ensuring socio-political order and stability in these societies.

About the Author

E. G. Garbuzarova
Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic university
Kyrgyzstan

Elena G. Garbuzarova, Doctor of Political Sciences

bld. 44, Kievskaj Str., Bishkek, 720065



References

1. Laumulin M. S. On the question of the formation of post-Soviet statehood in Central Asia. Contours of global transformations, 2016;9(5):95-113. (In Russ.)

2. Zakaria F. The emergence of illiberal democracies. Logos. 2004;2(42):55-70. (In Russ.)

3. Zvyagelskaya I. D. The Middle East and Central Asia: Global trends in regional execution. Moscow: Aspect Press; 2018. 224 p. (In Russ.)

4. Di Gregorio, A. The crisis of modern democracy and the emergence of new intermediate categories between democracy and authoritarianism. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2020;3:26-33. https://doi.org/10.12737/jflcl.2020.017

5. David G. Lewis. Varieties of Authoritarianism in Central Asia. Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Central Asia. Routledge; 2021. P. 478. (In Russ.)

6. Ionova E. The results of the presidential elections in Uzbekistan: the economic and political course of Sh. Mirziyoyev. Russia and the new states of Eurasia. 2021;4:97-114. https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2021-4-97-114 (In Russ.)

7. Kharitonova O.G., Kudryashova I.V. Political regimes and regime changes in the foam of the populist wave. Political Science. 2022;1:224-244. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.01.10 (In Russ.)

8. Zhaparov S. Zhaӊy Kyrgyzstand kuruunun bagyty (ideologiyasy). Bishkek: PrintExpress; 2023. 136 p. (In Russ.)

9. Khadyrov R.Y. The institutional model of the political system of Tajikistan: hierarchy and specificity of institutions. International Relations. 2023;1:12-19. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0641.2023.1.39684 (In Russ.)

10. Sharifzoda A., Sharifzoda M.T. The role of the leader of the nation in the development of the economy of Tajikistan. Bulletin of the Tajik State University of Law, Business and Politics. The Humanities series. 2018;4(77): 5-15. (In Russ.)

11. Kharitonova O.G. Political regimes and regime changes in the mirror of scientific discourse. Bulletin of the RUDN. Series: Political Science. 2017;19(4):379-391. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2017-19-4-379391 (In Russ.)

12. Pakhrutdinov S.I. Uzbekistan: responsibility for sustainable development and the intensity of accelerated changes. Trajectories of Russia’s political development: Institutes, projects, actors: materials of the All-Russian Scientific conference RAPN. Moscow: MPSU; 2019. 472 p. (In Russ.)

13. Zhiltsov S.S. Central Asia: features of political development. Bulletin of the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. Russia and the World. 2020;1(23):143-160. (In Russ.)

14. Biryukov S.V., Chirun S.N., Andreev A.V., Rakhimzhanova D.A. The political crisis in Kazakhstan: origins, current state, prospects for development and settlement. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, Philosophy, Sociology, Political science. 2023;71:225-236. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/71/21 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Garbuzarova E.G. Features of Political Processes in Central Asian Countries: at the present Stage. Post-Soviet Issues. 2024;11(4):312-324. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2024-11-4-312-324

Views: 246


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-8920 (Print)
ISSN 2587-8174 (Online)