“Hybrid Landscape” in the Near East
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2017-4-4-280-296
Abstract
In 2015 Syrian President turned to Russia with a request for military assistance to fight the jihadist organization “Islamic State” (ISIL) prohibited in Russia. The RF Council of Federation has given permission to RF President to use armed forced of the Russian Federation in the territory of Syria. One of the purposes of the Russian involvement in military actions was to prevent spreading of terrorism at the distant approaches to our country. Military actions have been waged on vast expanses of Syria with its specific landscape and climatic conditions, in deserts and semi-deserts. The consequences of military actions that flared up time and again in this region and their effect on the natural environment have been investigated in detail and discussed in mass media. Modern military actions have acquired special nature owing to technological advances in the military area and they turned into the new, so-called “hybrid war”. This war of a new military and technical generation combines traditional and non-traditional irregular wars and requires hi-tech weapons. In other words, the hybrid war required the hybrid methods of its waging. High-accuracy weapons allow for conducting military actions without intrusion to the enemy’s territory and making strikes over many thousand kilometers using aircraft and seabased missiles equipped with the modern devices of objective control, satellite navigation, etc.
As a result, the spatial and in-depth damage and destruction of the natural environment become sharply reduced. So, we are speaking here about new ecologized military actions which consequences may be termed as “hybrid ecology”.
About the Author
Igor S. ZonnRussian Federation
Doctor of Geography, Academician of RANS
bld. 43/1, Baumanskaj str., Moscow 107005, Russia;
References
1. Zonn I. S. War in the Persian Gulf and Desertification. Problems of Desert Development. 1991;3-4:133-144. (In Russ.)
2. Zonn I. S. Environmental Consequences in the Gulf War. RAS Proceedings. Geographical Series. 1992;2:140-147. (In Russ.)
3. Chichagov V. P. War and Desert. Moscow: Institute of the geographical of RAS; 2007. Pp. 56-78. (In Russ.)
4. Chkanikova O. V., Dronin N. M. Belligero Complexes in the Iraqi Territory. Moscow: GEOS; 2008. Pp. 228-238. (In Russ.)
5. Omar A. S., Bhat N. R., Adel A. Critical Assessment of the Environmental Consequences of the Invasion of Kuwait, the Gulf War, and the Aftermath. In: Environmental Consequences of War and Aftermath. Eds. Tarek A.Kassim, Damiá Barceló. Berlin: Springer; 2009. РР. 141-170.
6. Fedorchenko A., Krylov A. Scientific Assessment of the Islam Radicalism Apotheoses. International Life. 2016;2:181-187. (In Russ.)
7. Denny L. America Conquers Britain. Top Score in Economic War. Moscow: Gosizdatelstvo; 1930. Pp.3-10. (In Russ.)
8. Alekseev R. F. US Militarism: War Machine, Blocks, Bases and Acts of Aggression. Moscow: Politizdat; 1985. Pp. 112-116. (In Russ.)
9. Khozin G. S. Militarism and Ecology. In: Geography of Militarism. Moscow: Mysl; 1984. Pp. 21-34. (In Russ.)
10. Shoygu S. Architecture of Rally Up. VPC. 2016;17:4. (In Russ.)
11. Neymark M. A. Strategy of “Clever Force” in West-Russia Relationships. Moscow: Kannon+; 2016. Pp. 189-211. (In Russ.)
12. Heidner W. J. Preparing for War in the Desert Southwest: From the California — Arizone Maneuver Area to the Yuma Test Branch (and Beyond). Berlin: Springer; 2016. Pp. 37-50.
13. Mikhailov A. Star of Intelligence Officer. VPC. 2016;17:1. (In Russ.)
14. Babaev A. G., Sultanov F.F. Desert Ecology and Man Adaptation to the Arid Zone. Problems of Desert Development. 1985;1:3-8. (In Russ.)
15. Robinson D. P. Impact of Different Weapons on Ecosystems. Moscow: UNEP; 1981. Pp. 9-14. (In Russ.)
16. Westling A. H. Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment. London: Science; 1977. Pp. 3-10.
17. Sidel Victor W., Levy Barry S., Slutzman Jonathan E. Prevention of War and Its Environmental Consequences. Berlin: Springer; 2009. pp. 21-39.
18. Milkov F. N. Physical Geography. Landscape Science and Geographic Encyclopedia. Voronezh: VGU Publishers; 1986. 328 p. (In Russ.)
19. Shoygu S. K. Springboards and Border Lines. VPC. 2017;1:4. (In Russ.)
20. Sokolov A. Umbrella over Syria. VPC. 2016;9:3-4. (In Russ.)
21. Gracheva A. Temp Army. VPC. 2015;29:3. (In Russ.)
22. Gerasimov V. Experience in Syria. VPC. 2016; 9:4. (In Russ.)
23. Tikhomirov S. N. Specific Aspect of Environmental Safety and International Law. Moscow: Science; 2000, Pp. 70-79. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Zonn I.S. “Hybrid Landscape” in the Near East. Post-Soviet Issues. 2017;4(4):280-296. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2017-4-4-280-296