Turkish policy in the South Caucasus
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2018-5-3-284-297
Abstract
The South Caucasus region traditionally has an important role to play in global politics. This region for centuries has been an arena of confrontation for geopolitical and geostrategic interests between regional states and world powers; this affected the main transport routes, different cultures and religions. With the collapse of the USSR, the South Caucasus became an important and strategic place for Western countries; this bolstered the weakening of Russian influence in the region and the creation of a catalyst for further strengthening of its partners. Western countries sought to establish control over the extraction and diversification of Azerbaijani hydrocarbons. To fulfill these goals Western countries have relied on their ally Turkey, which also pursues its interests in the South Caucasus region.
Since the early 1990s, Turkey’s policy towards the countries of the South Caucasus has intensified. Turkey developed policies of expanding its influence in the region. These policies were complex; it included both economic, energy and cultural components. A key element of Turkey’s policy in the region was the energy aspect. In the issue of diversifying the energy resources of the South Caucasus Turkey has made significant progress by implementing projects of pipelines going through its territory, she achieved the status of an energetic conveyor. Another important area of Turkey’s policy in the South Caucasus was the cultural and educational aspect. It is based on the policy of «neo-Ottomanism», which includes elements of «pan-Turkism». The main purpose of this idea was to expand Turkey’s influence by educating pro-Turkic youth in the countries of the region, and also create a positive image for Turkey among various segments of the population that would support its policies.
The peculiarity of Turkey’s policy is a multilateral and flexible policy that includes both economic integration, energy cooperation, and a soft and effective policy that includes cultural interaction based on ethnic and linguistic similarity.
Keywords
About the Author
M. S. SuvanovaRussian Federation
bld. 53/2, Ostozhenka str. Moscow, 119021
References
1. Hannon J., Dudden L. US-TURKEY Relation under the AK Party. Ankara: SETA; 2017. 205 p.
2. Öksüz H. Batı Trakya Türkleri. Hikmet. Ankara: Published; 2006. 243 p.
3. Baskın O. Türk Dış Politikası. Istanbul: lletişim Yayıncılık; 2010. P. 366–440.
4. Gadjiev K.S. Geopolitic of Caucasus. Moscow: International Relations; 2001. 464 p. (In Russ.)
5. Gözen P.E. Turkish Foreign Policy. Ankara: METU; 2015. 273 p.
6. Hannon J., Dudden L. US-TURKEY Relation under the AK PARTY. Ankara: SETA; 2017. 205 p.
7. Baskın O. Türk Dış Politikası. Istanbul: lletişim Yayıncılık; 2010. P. 366–440.
8. Özcan T. «Türkiye’de Siyasal Rejim ve Dış Politika». İstanbul: Türk Dış Politikasının Analizi; 1994. 311 p.
9. Eshba E.D. Regional cooperation at the Black Sea: achievements, problems and perspectives. Moscow: MGIMO; 2013. 47 p. (In Russ.)
10. Davutoglu A. «Strategic Depth». Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University; 2001. 563 p.
11. Baskın O. Türk Dış Politikası. Istanbul: lletişim Yayıncılık A. Ş; 2010. P. 366–440.
12. İskender S. «Dünya Enerji Durumu ve Geleceğe Yönelik Planlar». İstanbul: WEC Turkısh National Committee; 2006. Р. 27-30.
13. http://www.socar.az/socar/en/home [Accessed: 10.03.2018]
14. Grinevetskiy S.R., Zhiltsov S.S., Zonn I.S., Kosarev A.N., Kostyanoi A.G. The Black Sea Encyclopedia. Berlin: Springer; 2015. 889 p.
15. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Elektrik [Accessed: 04.03.2018]
16. Gareth M. Winrow, The Southern Gas Corridor and Turkey’s Role as an Energy Transit State and Energy Hub. Insight Turkey. 2013;15(1):145-163.
17. Karakaya L. «Turkey Played its Hand Well in the Energy Game». http//www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/13306910437.Turkey_Played_its_ Hand_Well_in_the_Energy_Game.pdf [Accessed: 05.04.2018]
18. Zhiltsov S.S., Zonn I.S. Black Sea Region: New Outlines. Moscow: MGOU; 2010. 198 p. (In Russ.)
19. http://www.tanap.com/content/file/TANAP_Hukumetlerarasi_Anlasma.pdf (Accessed:10.04.2018)
20. http://www.socar.az/socar/en/home [Accessed: 05.02.2018]
21. Edward C. Chow «Turkey as an Energy Bridge», Turkey’s Evolving Dynamics: Strategic Choices for US-Turkey Relations. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2009. С. 77-78.
22. Stevens P. Transit Troubles: Pipelines as a Source of Conflict. London: Chatham House; 2009. P.11-23.
23. http://www.meb.gov.tr/ [Accessed:17.04.18]
24. Zhiltsov S.S. Revolutionary Waves in the Post-Soviet Expanse. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2005;6:7-13.
Review
For citations:
Suvanova M.S. Turkish policy in the South Caucasus. Post-Soviet Issues. 2018;5(3):284-297. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2018-5-3-284-297