The Fight of Ukraine for the Autocephal Church in the context of politicization of Religion
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-2-250-258
Abstract
The article analyzes the process of the movement of the Ukrainian authorities and certain church circles for receiving Tomos (ecclesiastical permission) for the creation of a single Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which has now unfolded. The authors point out the extreme politicization of this process, which concerns, above all, the affairs of the Church and believers. The methodological basis of the research was the recently developed philosophy of schism, which allows one to see the consequences of splits, primarily in the polarization of society. For the analysis, the authors also used the method of textological analysis of the statements of the participants of the marked events. In the course of the study, the authors concluded that the facts and events taking place in connection with the unfolding process of Ukraine’s struggle for obtaining Tomos in Ukraine point to the politicization at the present time of not only religion, but also state-confessional and inter-church relations. The materials of the research allow us to conclude that the claims of the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to the right to solely extradite Tomos to autocephaly alone are unreasonable, since there is no source under them except for one’s own will and the cathedral of the Constantinople Church. And also the authors point out the lack of consensus of other autocephalous Churches that would grant such a right to the Ecumenical Patriarch.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. A. GrivaRussian Federation
Olga A. Griva, Doctor of Philosophy
bld. 4, Academician Vernadsky Prospekt Str., Simferopol, 295007, Republic of Crimea
N. V. Yaksa
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Yaksa, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences
bld. 4, Academician Vernadsky Prospekt Str., Simferopol, 295007, Republic of Crimea
References
1. His Holiness Patriarch Alexy II, Speech at the ceremony on which he was awarded the degree of Doctor of Theology honoris causa of the Tbilisi Theological Academy during a visit of His Holiness to Georgia April 27 May 1, 1996 Newsletter of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate of July 1. 1996:3. (In Russ).
2. Poroshenko wanted to create an autocephalous church in Ukraine. 2018.17 April. URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2018/04/17/cerkov/ [Аccessed: 12.11.2019] (In Russ).
3. Words by Bartholomew The situation of the Orthodox Church in Ukraine. Dossier. 2018.27 July. URL: https://tass.ru/info/5408814 2018. [Аccessed: 08.10.2019] (In Russ).
4. The ROC stated that it does not recognize the supremacy of the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. 2018.16 September. URL: https://www.newsru.com/religy/16sep2018/norecognition.html [Аccessed: 10.23.2019] (In Russ).
5. The UOC demanded that the Constantinople exarchs leave the canonical territory of Ukraine. 2018.25 September. URL: https://www.newsru.com/religy/25sep2018/exarchconflict.html [Аccessed: 11.28.2019] (In Russ).
6. Shishkov A.V. 10 theses on the situation around the proclamation of Ukrainian autocephaly. Religious Life. 2018.16 September. URL: https://religious.life/2018/09/shishkov-10-tezisov-o-situacii-vokrug-provozglash-enija-ukrainskoj-avtokefalii/ [Аccessed: 10.14.2019] (In Russ).
7. Kaverin N. The crisis in the Russian church. Tomorrow. 2018. September 27. URL: http://zavtra.ru/blogs/krizis_v_russkoj_tcerkvi [Аccessed: 02.05.2019] (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Griva O.A., Yaksa N.V. The Fight of Ukraine for the Autocephal Church in the context of politicization of Religion. Post-Soviet Issues. 2020;7(2):250-258. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-2-250-258