Preview

Post-Soviet Issues

Advanced search

Central Asian States: Difficulties on the Path of Rapprochement

https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-3-300-311

Abstract

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the new independent states of Central Asia had faced serious problems, such as the lack of experience in building state system, border demarcation, severe economic situation, threat of interethnic conflicts. However, that period was appropriate for integration initiatives in Central Asia. The economies of the post-Soviet republics in the region had been formed by the common Soviet system, the states depended from each other. In addition, the geopolitical situation in the region was favorable for rapprochement; Russia, China, the United States were not actively involved in regional processes. In the period from 1994 to 2005, the Central Asian republics initiated several integration projects, such as the Common economic space (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan), the Central Asian Economic Community (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan), the Central Asian Cooperation Organization (all republics of Central Asia, except Turkmenistan). It should be noted that the integration process in the region implied all republics of Central Asia, except Turkmenistan, which had been ignoring any initiatives of neighbor countries. These structures did not achieve their goal, such as the creation of a free trade zone as well as customs, currency and payment unions. After a prolonged period of integration initiatives, there were no real close relationships between the countries. The states still prefer to build their relations in a bilateral format. The article considers the reasons that prevent the Central Asian states from effectively pursuing a multilateral format of cooperation in the region. The main reasons that determine the unpreparedness of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan for cooperation in a multilateral format are identified. Attention has been paid to such factors as the collision of interests of outside players, leadership issues between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, water distribution policy and cross-border cooperation. The steps that Central Asian countries need to take to establish effective multilateral cooperation in the region are analyzed.

About the Author

G. Ch. Akunova
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Gulbara Ch. Akunova

bld. 53/2, Ostozhenka str. Moscow, 119021



References

1. Tolipov F. Central Asia: The Disintegration Theory. Central Asia at 25: looking back, moving forward. Bishkek; A collection of essays from Central Asia; 2017. P. 22-25.

2. Central Asian Economic Union (CAEU). URL: https://www.mid.ru/et/foreign_policy/international_safety/regprla/-/asset_publisher/YCxLFJnKuD1W/content/id/585382 [Accessed: 25.02.2020] (In Russ.).

3. Primbetov S. Integration prospects in Central Asia. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2006;6:115-124.

4. Tofan A.V. The strategic interests of the USA, Russia and China in the Central Asia at the present stage. International scientific journal Interactive science. 2016;10:86-90.

5. David Trilling. Borrowing blind: Why we don’t know how much Eurasia owes China 2019.URL: https://clck.ru/PF66X [Accessed: 21.05.20] (In Russ.).

6. Ziyadullaev N. Central Asian states in the modern world: development strategies and global challenges. Problems of Management Theory and Practice. 2018;12:8-17.

7. Meshcheryakov K.E. Regional leadership in Central Asia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. 2006;1:199-127.

8. Statement of heads of water economy organizations of Central Asian Republics and Kazakhstan adopted on 10-12 October 1991. Interstate Commission for Water Coordination of Central Asia. URL: http://www.icwc-aral.uz/statute2.htm [Accessed: 17.05.2020] (In Russ.).

9. Zhiltsov S., Bimenova A. Central Asian politics regarding water use of transboundary rivers. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2015;16:78-87.

10. Eschment B. Water resources distribution in Central Asia: an insoluble problem? FriedrichEbert-Stiftung research, 2011. URL: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/moskau/08598.pdf [Accessed: 20.05.2020] (In Russ.).

11. Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan agreed to exchange electricity. 2020. URL: https://ru.sputnik.kg/economy/20200527/1048449277/kyrgyzstan-kazahstan-ehlektroehnergiya-obmen.html [Accessed: 28.05.2020] (In Russ.).

12. The Alma-Ata Declaration (Alma-Ata, 21 December 1991) URL: http://cis.minsk.by/page/178 [Accessed: 25.05.2020] (In Russ.).

13. Rudov G.A. Ferghana Valley: Reasons for Crisis Phenomena and Ways of Their Neutralization. Russia and the Moslem World. 2015;5:32-44.

14. Dankov A. Conflicts in Central Asia. Conflicts in the Post-Soviet Space: Prospects for a Settlement and the Role of Russia. 2016;36:45-50.

15. Sultan Khan Akkuly. For nearly 20 years, Central Asian leaders have been talking about integration, which does not exist. URL: https://rus.azattyq.org/a/central_asia_union/1936276.html [Accessed: 20.04.20] (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Akunova G.Ch. Central Asian States: Difficulties on the Path of Rapprochement. Post-Soviet Issues. 2020;7(3):300-311. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-3-300-311

Views: 6707


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-8920 (Print)
ISSN 2587-8174 (Online)