Potential of development of economic cooperation between Russia and EAEU and CIS countries
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-3-327-346
Abstract
The article examines the peculiarities of the economic situation and the potential for the development of regional integration of Russia and the CIS and EAEU countries. The complexity of the current economic downturn against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic and the turbulence of world energy markets has a mixed impact not only on the economic downturn in the countries of the region, but also on integration processes, their nature and development prospects. In this context, the study of a set of interrelated processes from the point of view of the formation of economic policies of countries, their foreign economic guidelines and goals is relevant. At the same time, the methodology for integrated assessment of the development potential of regional integration is based on the following assumptions: the need to coordinate and develop economic development strategies and geopolitical strategies; creating the attractiveness of the Russian economy as a core of integration; development of common energy markets as the basic platform for integration in the EAEU.
About the Author
A. A. Migranyan
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Россия
Россия
Aza А. Migranyan, DSc in Economics
bld. 32, Nakhimovskij Av., Moscow, 117218
References
1. Ershov M. Ten years after the global crisis: risks and prospects. Economic issues. 2019;1:37-54. (In Russ.)
2. Mead J. Theory of Customs Unions. URL: http://seintstituteru/Files/Veb6-45_Mead.pdf [Accessed: 30.05.2020].
3. Glazyev S. World Economic Ways in Global Economic Development. Economics and Mathematical Methods. 2016;52(2):3-29; Glazyev S. Applied results of the theory of world economic structures. Economics and mathematical methods. 2016;52(3):3-21. (In Russ.)
4. Greenberg R.S. “I do not see a reasonable alternative to direct cash payments to people!”. URL: https://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/466596 [Accessed: 30.05.2020] (In Russ.)
5. A plan to overcome the economic consequences of a new coronavirus infection. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. URL: https://ecocnomy.gov.ru [Accessed: 30.05.2020] (In Russ.)
6. HSE Report. A jerk or a falstart? Exit from quarantine by coronavirus in the spring of 2020 (experience of 30 countries). https://www.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/363399753.pdf [Accessed: 30.05.2020] (In Russ.)
7. Abramov V.L. Effects of mutual and foreign trade of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union: factors of deterrence and growth. Modern science: topical problems of theory and practice. Series: Economics and Law. 2018;7:77-81. (In Russ.)
8. CIS Free Trade Area Agreement (Signed in St. Petersburg 18.10.2011). Доступно по URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=121497&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&rnd=0.5505623610966519 [Accessed: 30.05.2020] (In Russ.)
9. Sakharova O.S., Rastopchina Yu.L. Study of models of efficiency of foreign trade activities: macroeconomic aspect. Scientific statements of BelSU. It is gray. Economy. Informatics. 2015;13(210):71–77. (In Russ.)
10. Balassa B. Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative advantage. The Manchester School. 1965;33:99–123
11. Abramov V.L. Integration effects of mutual and foreign trade of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union: state and growth factors. Eurasian Union: issues of international relations. 2018;3(25):64-73. (In Russ.)
12. Andronova I.V. Eurasian Economic Union: potential and limitations for regional and global leadership. Bulletin of international organizations: education, science, new economy. 2016;11(2):7-23. (In Russ.)
13. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; 1950. P. 43.
14. Andreeva E.V., Klepikov V.I. and others. Integration of Foreign Electricity Markets. Moscow: NP Association Market Council; 2017. 126 p. (In Russ.)
15. Basco A.I. Techno-integration of Latin America: institutions, exponential trade, and equality in the era of algorithms. 2017. URL: https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/8657 [Accessed: 23.05.2020]
16. Echevarría C., Jesurun-Clements N., Mercado J., Trujillo C. Integración Eléctrica Centroamericana: Génesis, Beneficios y Prospectiva del Proyecto SIEPAC: Sistema de Interconexión Eléctrica de los Países de América Central. URL: https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/8237#sthash.t399tQwF.dpuf [Accessed: 18.04.2020].
17. ECOWAS Regional Electricity Regulatory Authority. Annual Report of Activities 20122013. URL: https://erera.arrec.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ERERA-ANNUAL-REPORT-2012-2013-english.pdf [Accessed: 18.04.2020].
18. Infrastructure Consortium for Africa (ICA). Regional Power Status in African Power Pools Report. 2011. URL: https://www.icafrica.org/fileadmin/documents/Knowledge/Energy/ICA_RegionalPowerPools_Report.pdf [Accessed: 18.04.2020].
19. South American Energy Council of UNASUR (CES). URL: http://www.unasursg.org/en/node/342 [Accessed: 18.04.2020].
20. Southern African Power Pool. Annual Report. 1995-1997. URL: http://www.sapp.co.zw/sites/default/files/SAPP%20report%20%2819951997%29%20%281%29.pdf [Accessed: 18.04.2020].
Review
For citations:
Migranyan A.A. Potential of development of economic cooperation between Russia and EAEU and CIS countries. Post-Soviet Issues. 2020;7(3):327-346. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-3-327-346
Views:
1412
JATS XML
Email this article 