Unrecognized States of the Post-Soviet Space: Problems and Prospects

The world order of the 21st century is characterized by transformational processes changing the spatial-temporal coordinates of international life. The features of the present stage are ambivalent processes (integration and disintegration; globalization and deglobalization).

The article analyzes the transformation processes in post-Soviet space. The relevance of the study is caused by the presence of several frozen conflicts in the post-Soviet space that have changed the configuration of the region and have been enhancing its conflict potential since they are far from settling and constructive resolution. The conflict potential of the post-Soviet space is increased because of the presence of new state formations: the unrecognized de facto states thePridnestrovianMoldavianRepublicand theNagorno-KarabakhRepublic, and partially recognized Abkhazia andSouth Ossetia.

The article also deals with the statehood acquisition and the formation of a new status of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, theNagorno-KarabakhRepublicand Transnistria. It emphasizes the necessity to solve the problem of obtaining external legitimization of the sovereignty of these political-territorial entities not only within the legal framework, but also within the political and social sphere.

The actualization of frozen conflicts is only a matter of time, and in the context of the deterioration of relations between global players pursuing their own interests in the region, it can be used as an argument for aggravating the international situation.

The principal approach to the study of this problem is the combination of comparative historical, institutional and situational methods that allow us to comprehensively consider the forms of international legitimization of small states in contemporary international relations and analyze conflict situations.

The article presents various theoretical concepts on the problem of unrecognized states; the possibilities of further development of these partially recognized states are discussed. The difficulties of political integration and the difficulties of resolving frozen conflicts, in particular, due to the lack of a full-fledged dialogue between all parties to the conflict, are highlighted.

The article is valuable as an analytical material for practical use by agencies and organizations involved in the development of political content in theSouth Caucasusregion.

The authors conclude that in the issue of the existence of unrecognized States of the post-Soviet space, the time factor is essential because in these territories new generations of people are born who perceive themselves as full-fledged citizens of sovereign States.

1. Mikheeva G. States «de facto». What was the fate of the unrecognized republics in the post USSR? European dialogue. 2018. December 2. URL: http://www.eedialog.org/ru/2018/01/15/de-fakto-gosudarstva-na-territorii-sssr-tranzit-bez-mezhdunarodnogo-priznaniya/ [Accessed: 25.12.2019] (In Russ.)

2. Dugin A.G. URL: http://ratnikjournal.narod.ru/zip/Dugin.Geopolitika.pdf [Accessed: 12.01.2020]

3. Thomas de Waal. Uncertain territory. The strange life and curious sustainability of de facto states. New Eastern Europe. 2018; no. 3-4. 2019/ December 2. URL: https://neweasterneurope.eu/2018/04/26/uncertain-territory-strange-life-curious-sustainability-de-facto-states/ [Accessed: 30.12.2019]

4. Eritsyan E.E. Neoinstitutional approach in the study of unrecognized and partially recognized republics of the post-Soviet space. In.: Collection of materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference «Unrecognized States: Methodological, Political and Legal Aspects». Samara; Samara Academy for the Humanities; 2016. P. 19-25. (In Russ.)

5. Markedonov S. M. De facto formation of the post-Soviet space: twenty years of state building. Analytical reports of the Caucasus Institute. 2012, №5, Jan. Ed. Aleksandr Iskandaryan. Yerevan: Caucasus Institute; 24 p. (In Russ.)

6. Markedonov S.M. Land and will. Russia in the global world. 2012;5:175-182. (In Russ.)

7. Tsutsiev A. Atlas of ethnopolitical history of the Caucasus (1774-2004). Moscow: Europe; 2006. 128 p. (In Russ.)

8. Rybin A. Unrecognized world. Russian Reporter, no. 20 (485). 2019. December 2. URL: https://expert.ru/russian_reporter/2019/20/nepriznannyij-mir_1/ [Accessed: 30.12.2019] (In Russ.)

9. Silaeva V. Unrecognized states in the logic of post-imperial development. 2019. December 4. URL: http://www.russiancouncil.ru/blogs/victoria-silaeva/?id_4=2270 (In Russ.)

10. Shakaryants S. Recognition of unrecognized States. 2019. December 4. URL: www.regnum.ru/news/663614.html [Accessed 29.12.2019] (In Russ.)

11. Sergeeva L.V. Transformation of the political regime of the partially recognized republic of Abkhazia. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. 2015;2:1-7. (In Russ.)

12. Ibyatov F.M. Political system of South Ossetia: modern history and prospects. Economics. 2010;5:120. (In Russ.)

13. Meleshkina E.Yu. Formation of States and Nations in the post-Soviet space: unrecognized States. [updated December 4, 2019; cited December 4, 2019]. URL: http://www.mgimo.ru/uploads/files/Meleshkina%20Post-Soviet.doc [Accessed: 30.12.2019]. (In Russ.)

14. Krylov A. Unrecognized states: «internal legitimacy» is important”. 2019. December 4. URL: http://theanalyticon.com/?p=1550&lang=ru [Accessed: 10.01.2020]. (In Russ.)

15. Life in isolation: how do unrecognized countries survive? 2015. Feb. 2. URL: https://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/52709?page=5 [Accessed: 12.01.2020].

16. Economic Development Programme of the Republic of Abkhazia. URL: http://apsnypress.info/upload/Programma_25shagov_Econom-Razvitiya_Abkhazii_170209.pdf [Accessed: 10.01.2020].

17. Kazin F.A. Russia’s relations with South Ossetia and Abkhazia in comparative perspective. Russia in a Global World. 2021;5:322-336. (In Russ.)

18. The unrecognized state of Donbass as points of economic growth? 2015. Nov. 12 URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/methodology/2164/ [Accessed 15.01.2020].

19. Gadzhiev K.S. Introduction to Geopolitics. Moscow: Logos; 2000. 429 p.

20. Panarin A.S. What world are we going to live in? Geopolitical forecast made in 1997. 2019. December 4. URL: http://www.patriotica.ru/actual/panarin_prognoz.html [Accessed: 30.12.2019]

21. Problems of Abkhazian demography: Abkhazian language. Official website of the People’s party of Abkhazia. A URL: http://www.kiaraz.org/page76/ [Accessed 15.01.2020].

22. Markedonov S. Post-Soviet South Caucasus: traditionalism plus modernization. Prognosis. 2007;1:340. (In Russ.)

23. Communique of the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Republic of South Ossetia on mutual recognition and establishment of diplomatic relations between the Republic of South Ossetia and the Syrian Arab Republic. URL: http://www. mfa-rso.su/node/2583 [Accessed 15.01.2020].

24. «Places That Don’t Exist», BBC News, 4 May 2005. URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4491059.stm [Accessed 11.01.2020].

25. Giorgio Comai. The external relations of de facto states in the post-Soviet space. School of Law and Government. Dublin City University, 2018. URL: http://doras.dcu.ie/22159/1/Comai-PhD.pdf [Accessed 11.01.2020].