Preview

Post-Soviet Issues

Advanced search

Features of Kazakhstan’s Democratic Tranzit Model: Conceptual and Methodological Analysis

https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2022-9-4-423-436

Abstract

A typologically significant characteristic of the Kazakhstan model of democratic transit is the creation in Kazakhstan of a system of “super-presidential” public, in which the constitutional and legal status, functions and powers of all branches of government act as a transformed form of implementation of the principles of identitarian democracy. One of the most relevant descriptions of the features of this form is Guillermo O’Donnell’s concept of deliberative democracy. According to G. According to O’Donnell, delegative democracies are based on the premise that election to the presidency gives the winner the right to govern without resorting to the mediation of representative institutions of power. After all, the president is elected in order to be the personified embodiment of the nation, to determine and protect its interests with authority, assuming full responsibility for the fate of the country and the people. Other political institutions, for example, parties with their factionalism and permanent conflicts, are often only hindrances in the implementation of this mission. This feature of the legitimization of the political regime becomes the ideological basis for substantiating the compatibility of liberal democratic institutions with the process of personification of a political system built for a specific person.

About the Author

A. S. Seidumanov
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Alnur S. Seidumanov

bld. 53/2, Ostozhenka str., Moscow, 119021



References

1. Medushevsky A. Political regimes of Central Asia: constitutional forms within the framework of authoritarian modernization. Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe 2012;4(89):45-60. (In Russ.). obozrenie.

2. Truevtsev K. Central Asia: Models of political Legitimization. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2007;2(50):19-34. (In Russ.).

3. Shkel S.N. [Neopatrimonial practices and the stability of authoritarian regimes in Eurasia. Politiya. 2016;4(83):94-107. (In Russ.).

4. Makarenko B.I. Post-communist countries: some results of the transformation. Politiya. 2008;3(50):105-124. (In Russ.).

5. Lejphart A. Democracy in multi-component societies: a comparative study. Moscow: Aspekt Press; 1997. 287 p. (In Russ.).

6. Shtejner Yu. Is the distribution of power another Swiss “export product”? Etnos i politika. Moscow: URAO; 2000. P. 281-287. (In Russ.).

7. Kozlovski P. Society and the State: The inevitable dualism. Moscow: Respublika; 1998. 368 p. (In Russ.).

8. Kurganskaya V.D. Legal consciousness of ethnic groups of Kazakhstan: socio-cultural context of formation. Almaty: Centr gumanitarnyh issledovanij; 2004. 280 p. (In Russ.).

9. Nazarbaev N.A. Constitution — the basis of stability and prosperity of Kazakhstan. URL: https://kaznmu.kz/rus/konstituciYa-osnova-stabilnosti-i-pr/ [Accessed: 18.06.2022] (In Russ.).

10. Nazarbayev N.A. On the threshold of the XXI century. Almaty: Atamura; 2003. 256 p. (In Russ.).

11. Zhiltsov S.S., Zonn I.S. Features of political development of Kazakhstan at the present stage: results and prospects. Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2019;24(4):67-76. (In Russ.).

12. Gelman V. Modernization, institutions and the “vicious circle” of post-Soviet neopatrimonialism. St. Petersburg: Evropejskogo universiteta v g. Sankt-Peterburge; 2015. 44 p. (In Russ.).

13. Fisun A.A. Towards Rethinking Post-Soviet Politics: a neopatrimonial interpretation. Politicheskaya konceptologiya. 2010;4:158187. (In Russ.).

14. Franke-Schwenk A. Autocratic Stability and Post-Soviet Rentierism: the Cases of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. URL: https://www.academia.edu/1965766/ [Accessed: 18.06.2022]

15. Isaacs R. Between informal and formal politics: neopatrimonialism and party development in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. PhD thesis. London: Oxford Brookes University; 2009. 342 p.

16. Lewis D.G. Understanding the Authoritarian State: Neopatrimonialism in Central Asia. Brown Journal of World Affairs. 2012;XIX(1):115-125.

17. Kondorsky B.M. January 2022 events in Kazakhstan. Comparative-historical factors and prerequisites. Svobodnaya mysl’. 2022;2(1692):49-61. (In Russ.).

18. Masanov N. How to equip Kazakhstan. Tribuna «XXI veka». 1998. October 29. (In Russ.).

19. Yertysbayev E. Kazakhstan and Nazarbayev: the logic of change. Astana: Elorda; 2001. 576 p. (In Russ.).

20. Zaznaev O.I. Understanding the forms of government in foreign political science: the latest discussions. Politicheskaya nauka. 2014;1:1033. (In Russ.).

21. O’Donell G.A. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy. 1994;5(1):55-69.


Review

For citations:


Seidumanov A.S. Features of Kazakhstan’s Democratic Tranzit Model: Conceptual and Methodological Analysis. Post-Soviet Issues. 2022;9(4):423-436. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2022-9-4-423-436

Views: 634


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2313-8920 (Print)
ISSN 2587-8174 (Online)